Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_17.mat
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UUCA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.10, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
AAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.21, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGUU 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.57, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -8.75, deficit  5.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
CCUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -7.16, deficit  2.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UCGCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -8.33, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.65, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
AGGAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.36, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UAACA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
AUCCU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.34, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
CCCAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -4.16, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.35, deficit  0.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
UGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UUUCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -7.22, deficit  3.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUCGCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.13, deficit  3.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
UGGAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score     -11.92, deficit  8.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -8.17, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.90, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AGGCGU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.72, deficit -0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.21, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
UUAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.64, deficit  2.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
UUUGUA 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.63, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -3.94, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCAAC 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.18, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGCAAU 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.91, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AUAUCU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.57, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UCGAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GGCAAC 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.18, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCUUUC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.88, deficit  0.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.81, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
UAUCGA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -7.56, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGUUGC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.78, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UGAAAA 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.18, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GACAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.19, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCAUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -5.02, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UGAAGG 1  Matches 22; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.48, deficit  4.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GACAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.19, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CAAUAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.38, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAGGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.07, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGACAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.47, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGACAC 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.29, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.96, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUCUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGAAAU 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AGCAGU 1  Matches 22; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.76, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGUUAC 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
AAGAAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.98, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CCAAAG 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.62, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UUCGCA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.20, deficit  4.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AGUGAU 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.77, deficit  0.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.01, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GGGUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.40, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGAAAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.26, deficit  2.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGUUAG 1  Matches 37; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
GUUCCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46463.1,  4 NTs,                UUUCGA,score      -5.16, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUUAG 1  Matches 37; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
GUUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.70, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.95, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.90, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GCAGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.34, deficit  0.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
ACGUUU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -6.93, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GGACGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAGUGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.07, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUCAAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.40, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAUGAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -6.87, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.46, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CAGUAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
UGAACAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.56, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCGCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -7.79, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUGCCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -6.63, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UAAUGCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.88, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUUGAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.62, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
UUGUAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -7.85, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GGUUGGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.20, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GUGAGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.23, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGAUGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -6.74, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGUAGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.15, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGCAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUUUUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -5.16, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
CUCGACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.16, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGGUGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.56, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUAUCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGAGCAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.60, deficit  1.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUAGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -9.35, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
AUAUACU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -6.80, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CAUUAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
ACUAAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -8.61, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
GCUCAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.83, deficit  0.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGCAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.90, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGGGGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -8.06, deficit  2.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UUCACCA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.01, deficit  0.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UUUGCUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.93, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CGAGUAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.51, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAUUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -5.86, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.23, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGCGAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -9.22, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGAGCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.96, deficit  0.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
AUAGAUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -8.19, deficit  4.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CACAUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.06, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUCAAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.76, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
AAGUAGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
UUCUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -13.73, deficit  9.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
UGGUGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -5.75, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUGACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UUCGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -8.95, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GGGCGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -3.53, deficit  0.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGAAUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAGCAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.72, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCUAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.79, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UCAAGAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.26, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUGGCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -7.20, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35                                 
UCAGAUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.56, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUUACCUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -16.21, deficit  9.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUUAAAUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -6.42, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CAGGAGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -11.65, deficit  6.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
UAAUCCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -12.13, deficit  5.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCAACCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.25, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
AAAAAAAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CACGUAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -10.87, deficit  4.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GGUUGAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.24, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
GGGAGUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -12.08, deficit  5.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CGAACUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.93, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAAGCCCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -11.09, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
AUGAGAUU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.65, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUUGAUCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.69, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CGAAAGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.86, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUCUAAUA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -10.44, deficit  6.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GAAAAUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score     -10.51, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CAAAAGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.37, deficit  0.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGUGUAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.93, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GUAAGAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
UGUCUAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -11.22, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
GGCACUAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -8.85, deficit  4.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
UUCGAGCA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -11.56, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
AACCUUAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.34, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CGAGGCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -6.41, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGUGAAGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.63, deficit  4.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GUAUUUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.17, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GACUGCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.14, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CUCUGACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.01, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CUCGAUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.44, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GGAAGAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
UUGAAGUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.40, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
ACUAAACU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.14, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
CAUACCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -7.83, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAGAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -9.57, deficit  6.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUGUAUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.64, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CUAAACCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -10.05, deficit  6.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GAAAGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.01, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
ACGUGAUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.40, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AUCGUUUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.71, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GUUUAUUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -6.52, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GACUGUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.84, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GGAAGAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CACAAACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.18, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
UGAGAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.93, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CCAAACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -11.18, deficit  4.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CUGAUGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score     -10.14, deficit  5.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CGGCGUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score     -10.82, deficit  7.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUUGCUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.35, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CUCUCAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.72, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.88, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUGUCCGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.24, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
CUAGAACUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -9.77, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CGAUAAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.17, deficit  2.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GUCAUGCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.42, deficit  3.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGCCAAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUACCCCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.85, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CACGUGGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score      -9.85, deficit  2.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CUCUUGACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score     -10.14, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
AACUCGAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -11.75, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
CGUGAGUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.41, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAAAGAGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -7.78, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CACUGAAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.32, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GAUAUUAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -8.97, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
AUUGAGGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.30, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GAAUGGAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -9.86, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
AUUUGAAUU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -5.87, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GCGUCACCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -12.05, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GGAGAGCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.57, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CUUGAGUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.40, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CGGAAUUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -10.23, deficit  2.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CCGAAGUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score     -10.20, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
UUCCGAGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -7.93, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAAUCUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GCAGUAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -6.13, deficit  0.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GGCGUUAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -10.38, deficit  6.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
AAAAAUGAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.44, deficit  5.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUGAAUGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.67, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGCAAAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.91, deficit  0.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
CUUAUUAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.82, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCGAAUG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -5.74, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CUCAUCUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.50, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CAAGAAAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -7.22, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCGUGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -9.78, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGACUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -8.91, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUGAGUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -9.91, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGACUUAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -6.72, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGCCAAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.17, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
AGUCUUCGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score     -11.11, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUGGUUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -11.32, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAAUCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.11, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGGUCCCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.70, deficit  8.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUCUAAAUA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.35, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
UGUUAGAAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -8.53, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CGGGGCAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.78, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UCUAGGAAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -7.00, deficit  0.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GGCUUAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -9.17, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GGAUUGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -11.98, deficit  5.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGCACUUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -13.97, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CGGGAAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.97, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GCUCCAUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -9.91, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
CUCUUGAGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -9.57, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CGAUCGGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.73, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
UGUGUCUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -14.88, deficit  6.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GUUGUCGUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -10.18, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
GGGUGCAUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.87, deficit  5.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGACGAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score     -12.68, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGCCAGGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.82, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.97, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CCAGAUUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.54, deficit  6.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AUCGCCAGCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -9.72, deficit  5.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
GCUUCCAUAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.42, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUUCACCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.29, deficit  7.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAGCGGUAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -11.95, deficit  2.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
GGAUAAUUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.42, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAUAGUUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -16.22, deficit 10.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAGAGGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
AGUGUGCGGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.83, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGCGAAUUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.56, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CUCGGGAUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -7.96, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CCAGUAACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.07, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUAGAGUUUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.76, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GUCCGUCGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.10, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GAACUGCGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
UAAACUGUCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.04, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.49, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CGUAAGAUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -13.90, deficit  7.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAUAAAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -16.21, deficit  8.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CUAGCACUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -12.98, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
GCCAAAAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.62, deficit  7.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
AGGGAUAUAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -15.65, deficit  7.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUUCUUGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.19, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.96, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAGAUGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -13.77, deficit  8.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGAAGUUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.99, deficit  6.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUCCUUCGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -10.42, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CGAAAAUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.58, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUUUCUACUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -10.35, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CUUGAUCUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.30, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CGAGAUGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -8.21, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CCCGUUUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.43, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CUCAGAGGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -14.90, deficit 10.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCUUACGGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score      -8.76, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UAGGUGAGCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -10.94, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
CGAGGUAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UGUUUUUGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -10.73, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CAACCGUCCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.22, deficit  8.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGUCGUAUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -12.03, deficit  6.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
AGGAAGCUAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -13.24, deficit  6.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
AUGGACGUUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.66, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
UGUGAACGAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -9.38, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GGAGAUGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -6.43, deficit  0.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGAUAAAGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -11.03, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GGCUUAGCAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.96, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.84, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGGAAUUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -16.73, deficit  8.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAGAUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.27, deficit  6.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.30, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUGAUCUAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.89, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CCUUUUCGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -10.04, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
CUUGAACAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -14.84, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GUAAGGGGAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score      -8.98, deficit  1.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
AGGGACAAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.66, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.83, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGUGAAAUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.88, deficit  4.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUGUAGAUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -15.19, deficit  6.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGAUUGGACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -16.67, deficit  6.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CGGCUGACAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -13.30, deficit  7.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GGAGAUAUUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.41, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GACAGGAAAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.20, deficit  3.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAUUCUCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.92, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAUCCCAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.89, deficit  6.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGGAGAUGUAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.16, deficit  7.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.88, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUACACAAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -11.68, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GACUAAGCAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -13.05, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
CGGAAGCCAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -15.35, deficit  7.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
UCGAAAAGAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.25, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CGAGAGCAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -11.03, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
CGUGGACUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -15.25, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
UGAGUGAGAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -17.29, deficit 10.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GGAAAAAACAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.80, deficit  4.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCGCGUGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -17.33, deficit  8.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CGGUCAUGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.47, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CGAAAACUGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.23, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
UAGCCACGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_10751.2,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.12, deficit  6.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33                   
AGAAGCACUGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.11, deficit  7.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAAGUAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GGUAGGGCCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.57, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.84, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UAAGUGUAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -11.25, deficit  6.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
UGACGUCAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.32, deficit  6.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
AUAAACAUUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -11.74, deficit  6.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.15, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GGCUCGUCUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.87, deficit  7.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUAGCACUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.18, deficit  5.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
CGUAUGAUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -16.23, deficit  7.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
UCAAAAACGAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -12.34, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GGCUAAAUGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.52, deficit  3.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGUGCUCUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -12.84, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.07, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CAAGAAAAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -13.96, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GAGAUCAAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.76, deficit  8.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CUGGAGGUUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -13.36, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GUGAACAUACCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.52, deficit  3.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCACAAAUGCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.57, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.79, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAACGGUAGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -15.41, deficit  7.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CUCGAAGAUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -15.25, deficit  7.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCGAGGAUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.88, deficit  6.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.11, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUUUUCUAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -13.50, deficit  5.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
AAAUUAACCACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.32, deficit  6.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.67, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
UUCUUGUUAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -11.34, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.34, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CUUUUUAUAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -13.14, deficit  5.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
CUUGAGAAGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -11.51, deficit  5.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.34, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CUAACCUCAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -14.27, deficit  6.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CCUUAAUUAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.79, deficit  8.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
AUAACCGUGUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.27, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.19, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
AUAUACGGAACU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.89, deficit  8.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCAAAAAUAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.64, deficit  4.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.36, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUCUGAAUGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.78, deficit  7.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAGAAAAACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.10, deficit  4.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GGAAAGUAAUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -15.31, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCGCCGCUAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -11.50, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.04, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCACCGACUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -12.07, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GAAAAUGAAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.39, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GGACAGUGAGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.57, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.64, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCCGGACAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -10.82, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.94, ed 99, 5 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
AAUUUUUACAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -14.15, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
CACUCAGUUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -13.19, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.89, ed 99, 5 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
CCUUACAGAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38011.1, 13 NTs,        GCUUAGAAGCAGCC,score     -15.07, deficit  7.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.35, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUAACCGAAACUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -15.71, deficit  8.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CGAAGAAGAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -15.30, deficit  8.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CGCGUUGCGGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.87, deficit  6.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.76, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUUGCGAAACUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -13.86, deficit  6.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
UGAAGCCCUGAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -15.91, deficit  5.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.30, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
GGGCAGAGGGUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -13.87, deficit  7.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.35, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
UGGACGGUCUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -19.03, deficit  8.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
AGUCUUGAGAGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12870.1, 13 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -11.31, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.18, ed 99, 4 cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35
CAUACACAUAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.71, deficit  3.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.21, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCAAAUGGAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.86, deficit  7.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGUCUCAUUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94032.1, 10 NTs,          UAGUCUCUUUCG,score     -20.92, deficit 11.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGGAACAAUACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -16.11, deficit  7.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GACAGAAACACAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81205.2, 14 NTs,        CACUGAGACACGGG,score     -13.63, deficit  8.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35
GGCGGCGGGUCAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -14.99, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
GGGAGAGUGCUGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -17.87, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
4	100.0000	 85.2941	 78.2353	4
5	100.0000	 88.9412	 50.7059	23
6	100.0000	 86.8235	 50.8235	60
7	 99.6471	 53.8824	 16.0000	51
8	 99.6471	 27.7647	  4.9412	46
9	 98.5882	 18.2353	  1.7647	68
10	 95.0588	  6.5882	  0.1176	41
11	 83.6471	  3.4118	  0.0000	42
12	 43.7647	  0.3529	  0.0000	23
13	 18.2353	  0.4706	  0.0000	12
14	  5.6471	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.2941	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.2941	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.7059	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.4706	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.1176	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  86 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 135 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 142 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 225 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 237 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 239 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 245 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 245 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 249 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 252 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 285 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 294 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 302 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 303 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 306 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 309 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 311 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 313 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 341 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 354 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 354 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 364 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 378 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 381 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 398 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 401 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 404 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 422 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 438 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 442 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 442 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 445 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 453 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 468 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 482 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 494 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 518 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 527 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 541 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 577 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 580 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 582 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 584 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 594 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 600 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 607 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 619 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 627 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 669 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 678 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 692 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 748 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 769 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 798 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 833 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 870 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 876 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 901 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 921 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 924 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 930 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 934 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 947 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 957 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 1252 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 1261 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1382 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1709 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.3382%
Number of models giving false positives is 303 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.44
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.49
